The U.S. Politics

Biden Immigration Speech: The Significance of Terminology in Policy

Dr. ADAM TABRIZ
3 min readMar 10, 2024
Photo Created using Bing CoPilot

In a landscape of heightened sensitivity around immigration, President Joe Biden recently faced criticism for his language choices during an address that touched on the politically contentious issue of the United States’ open border policy.

During a pivotal moment, Biden used the term “illegal” to describe a Venezuelan man involved in a serious crime. This choice of words, situated deeply in the immigration policy debate, has reignited discussions about the impact of terminology on public perception.

The speech in question sparked a swift reaction from various advocacy groups and members of Biden’s party, many of whom advocate for the use of “undocumented” over “illegal” when describing individuals without official authorization to reside in the U.S. Many immigration advocates consider the latter term to be dehumanizing.

Recognizing the weight of his words, President Biden has since expressed regret over his terminology, emphasizing that it was not his intention to dehumanize the individual or the larger community of undocumented immigrants (MSN; MSN). The discourse surrounding this verbal correction sheds light on the complex dynamic between political rhetoric and its influence on policy and public sentiment.

Indeed, the public reaction has been mixed — some have praised the president for his ability and willingness to acknowledge his misstep. In contrast, others have demanded a more consistent and respectful approach to discussing such sensitive topics. Regardless of the varying viewpoints, the overarching message underscores the critical importance of carefully selecting language that respects the dignity of all individuals, particularly those in vulnerable positions.

Moreover, the political language sensitivity surrounding Biden’s speech cannot be understated. Words hold power, mainly when spoken by influential leaders, and can significantly impact relations with communities and constituencies (MSNBC). In a nation where immigration is a hot-button issue, shaping policies around human-centered and inclusive language could play a vital role in how legislation is crafted and perceived.

The broader implications of the president’s wording compel us to consider the impact of public perception on political statements. This event did not occur in a vacuum but as part of a larger conversation about the Biden administration’s handling of immigration-related concerns. Biden’s policies and positions on immigration reflect an ongoing struggle to balance progressive expectations with political pragmatism.

Notably, polling data suggests that although Biden’s State of the Union address was generally well-received, it was not without its critics, who remain watchful for further progress and improvements (CNN). His recent terminological stumble may seem minor in isolation, but it is consequential, serving as a potent reminder of the influence wielded by those in positions of power.

As we reflect on the ongoing discussions of United States immigration and open border policy, it is clear that the deliberate use of language is not only a matter of political correctness but an essential element in constructing just and humane policies. President Biden’s willingness to rectify his language presents a teaching moment for all in positions of governance: words matter, and they must be wielded with care.

References:

MSN. (2024a). Biden regrets using ‘illegal’ to describe immigrants in speech. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-regrets-using-illegal-to-describe-immigrant-in-speech/ar-BB1jCkzw

MSN. (2024b). Biden regrets using the word ‘illegal’ during State of the Union. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-says-he-regrets-using-the-word-illegal-during-state-of-the-union/ar-BB1jCozc

MSNBC. (2024). Exclusive: Biden says he regrets calling migrant ‘an illegal’ during State of the Union speech. Retrieved from https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/exclusive-biden-says-he-regrets-calling-migrant-an-illegal-during-state-of-the-union-speech-206028869556

CNN. (2024). CNN poll: 6 in 10 say they react positively to Biden’s speech. Retrieved from https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/exclusive-biden-says-he-regrets-calling-migrant-an-illegal-during-state-of-the-union-speech-206028869556

--

--

Dr. ADAM TABRIZ
Dr. ADAM TABRIZ

Written by Dr. ADAM TABRIZ

In this vast tapestry of existence, I weave my thoughts and observations about all facets of life, offering a perspective that is uniquely my own.

No responses yet