Did Giuliani Withhold Key Evidence? Georgia Election Workers Seek Default Judgment in Defamation Case — NewsBreak
The shocking truth is emerging as Rudy Giuliani, the lawyer affiliated with former President Donald Trump, has been accused of hiding crucial evidence in a defamation lawsuit filed against him by Georgia election workers. These workers were wrongly accused of voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election, and they now maintain that Giuliani intentionally kept vital evidence from them. The stakes are high, and the drama unfolds as the truth slowly comes to light.
Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss have initiated a lawsuit against Giuliani, claiming that his baseless accusations have defamed them and caused them emotional distress.
Making a splash with his statements, Giuliani, an influential member of Trump’s legal squad, launched a fiery attack against Freeman and Moss, alleging their involvement in illicit electoral activities during Georgia’s 2020 presidential race. Unsubstantiated assertions included:
- The duo was supposed to barricade the doors to Atlanta’s State Farm Arena to hinder the entry of impartial poll watchers.
- It was secretly slipping a USB drive to meddle with the ballot count.
- They are covertly stashing prohibited ballots in concealed suitcases.
Giuliani’s false accusations, they assert, lack crucial evidence necessary to prove their innocence and discredit him. Freeman and Moss argue that without this important evidence, a default judgment in their favor should occur.
Accusations of voter fraud, with their far-reaching consequences, are of significant importance in this case. We, as Georgians, have a vested interest in maintaining the integrity of our elections. These allegations must be grounded in verifiable evidence rather than mere speculation or political motivations not to undermine public trust in the democratic process.
It raises serious questions about Giuliani’s understanding of the legal process when he fails to substantiate his baseless accusations as a former mayor of New York City and a member of Trump’s legal team. One would expect that he would know better than to make such claims without sufficient evidence, which questions his credibility. The burden of proof lies on him; if he cannot fulfill it, it only further undermines his position.
Why would Giuliani hold back important evidence if he believed in the truth of his allegations? Is he being negligent or intentionally trying to deceive? Regardless, it’s obvious that his failure to provide the required evidence greatly undermines the credibility of his claims against Freeman and Moss. We, as curious onlookers, must question this behavior.
In their efforts to hold Giuliani responsible for his defamatory remarks, Freeman and Moss have taken a noteworthy action by requesting a default judgment. Should their wish be granted, it would serve as both vindication for the two election workers and a resounding declaration against the acceptance of baseless claims regarding voter fraud.
The integrity of our elections and the responsibility of public figures in making unsupported assertions are questioned by Ruby Freeman and Wandrea Moss in their case against Giuliani. As Georgians, we must insist on transparency, accountability, and allegations based on evidence. That is the only way to safeguard the strength and freedom of our democratic processes, ensuring groundless claims of voter fraud do not tarnish them.
Originally published at https://www.newsbreak.com.
